http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=mx&v=25
April 4, 2010
Arturo de Hoyos
Universidad Hispania
13131 Shadowlands Lane
Draper, UT 84020-8719
(801) 501-9349
Dear President de Hoyos:
I found your name in the U.S. News and World Report publication Secrets of the Lost Symbol. For several years now I have had something I have thought would be of interest to Freemasonry but had no idea where to pass it on to. I understand that my great grandfather (or his father, I’m not sure) was a Mason, but if so he was York Rite. His obelisk is in a cemetery in Philadelphia. “Linton” is an old Yorkshire name, which I imagine is just a coincidence. Anyway that connection is, shall we say, a little too old for me to trace down a contact.
You pointed out in the interview that the secrets of Freemasonry are not so important as the trust that the existence of secrets implies. I feel rather good about that attitude. I am not much for keeping secrets. Otherwise I would hardly be sending you this letter. Rest assured this is not a privileged communication, and you are free to make use of it in any way you like.
The fact is that fertility depends on kinship. The more kin a couple the more grandchildren they will have and probably the more children. The effect accumulates over multiple generations. I am sure you doubt this. We are all told that the bigger, more diverse and better mixed a gene pool the healthier it is and the greater the fertility that can be expected.
But that is simply not true. I have enormous amounts of evidence to support what I say. I have evidence posted at nobabies.net along with letters like this to people I think might profit from knowing and my thoughts on the matter. Recently it seems that somebody went over the sight and looked at hundreds of things I had posted. That was a monumental effort. The quickest way to get a feel for it is to go to nobabies.net and look at what I put up on March 25, 2010. It is a poster I presented at a genetics convention in Albuquerque last month. I talked to about two dozen experts and not one had anything substantial to say in contradiction. I was challenged on some details, but not on the general picture.
Think about what that could mean. The group that understood it would have a virtual monopoly on having babies. That would mean more than any amount of wealth or prestige. If you don’t think having babies is a critical issue, look at this. Wikipedia says you were born in Mexico. Here is the Mexican birth rate for the last few years.
Data obtained from
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=mx&v=25
It’s enough to make you queasy. I expect the curve will tilt downward more steeply as the population ages, but it looks like there is time to change.
It is not possible that there is a conspiracy out there trying to exploit this. They would have noticed me and asked what else I could tell them. But sadly the misinformation that is out there is accomplishing the same thing as if someone were trying to clear the planet.
I just thought you might be interested.
Sincerely,
M. Linton Herbert MD
There have been 3,798 visitors so far.